Causal Inference Working Group
This group is comprised of a multi-disciplinary group of students and faculty from Johns Hopkins University, who are interested in the application and development of statistical methods for drawing causal inferences about intervention effects from partially-controlled studies. The group meets alternate Thursdays from 12-1:30. Please contact Daniel Scharfstein at dscharf@jhsph.edu.
Schedule
| 3/11/04 | W6015 | Daniel Scharfstein | Introductory Session |
| 3/25/04 | W6015 | Ravi Varadhan and David Bishai | Discussion of Holland (1986) |
| 4/8/04 | W6015 | Group Discussion | Discussion of Neyman et al. (1990), Roy (1951), and Rubin (1978) |
| 4/15/04 | W9514 | Robert Moffitt and Daniel Scharfstein | Discussion of Angrist et al. (1996) |
| 5/6/04 | E2527 | Group Discussion | Discussion of Vytlacil (2002) |
| 5/20/04 | E2527 | Zhiqing Tan | Research Presentation |
| 6/3/04 | E2527 | Fan Li | Research Presentation |
| 6/24/04 | E2527 | Yi Huang | Research Presentation |
| 7/1/04 | E2527 | Brian Egleston | Research Presentation |
| 7/15/04 | E3130 | Group Discussion Led By Steve Cole | DAGs; Hernan (2004) and Robins (2001) |
| 7/29/04 | E3130 | Discussion Led by Tan and Zeger |
McCullagh (2002) |
| 8/19/04 | E3130 | Regression Discontinuity Design - Slade | Hahn et al. (2001), van der Lauuw (2002), Angrist and Lavy (1999) |
| 9/9/04 | W4019 | Organizational Meeting | |
| 9/23/04 | E2527 | TBA | TBA |
Papers
Angrist JD, Imbens GW, and Rubin DB (1996) Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables (with discussion). JASA, 91, 444-472.
Discussion: Robins JM and Greenland S, Heckman JJ, Moffitt RA, Rosenbaum PR and Rejoinder
Angrist J and Lavy V. (1999) Using Maimonides rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 533-75.
Dawid P (2000) Causal Inference without Counterfactuals (with discussion). JASA, 95, 407 - 447.
Hirano K and Imbens GW (2004) The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments
Holland PW (1986) Statistics and Causal Inference (with discussion), JASA 1986, 81, 945-970.
Discussion: Rubin DB, Cox DR, Glymour C, Granger C and Rejoinder
Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W (2001) Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica, 69(1): 201-9.
Hernan, M (2002) Graphical methods for causal inference from observational data. Web Notes.
McCullagh, P (2004) Exchangeability and regression models
Neyman J, Dabrowska DM and Speed TP (1990) On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments (with discussion). Statistical Science, 5, 465-472
Discussion: Rubin DB (1990) Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies
Roy AD (1951) Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 135-146.
Robins JM (2001)
Data, Design, and Background Knowledge in Etiologic Inference. Epidemiology, 11, 313-320.Rubin DB (1974) Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-randomized Studies Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688- 701.
Rubin DB (1978) Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34-58.
Van der Klaauw W (2002) Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression-discontinuity approach. International Economic Review, 43(4): 1249-87.
Vytacil (2002) Independence, Montonicity, and Latent Index Models: An Equivalence Result Econometrica 70, 331-341.
Philosophy References
Aristotle
Hardie RP and Gayle RK Physics in Introduction to Aristotle (edited by McKeon R)
Hume
There are essentially two primary works of relevance (to causality) by Hume: (a) A Treatise on Human Nature (commonly referred to as "the treatise"), and (b) An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding (commonly referred to as "the Inquiry"). In addition, Hume also wrote an "Abstract" under a pseudonym (the abstract is sometimes mistakenly attributed to John Adam Smith, the famous economist, who was a close friend of Hume), which was supposed to lay out for the "lay" audience a simple summary of the arguments presented in the inquiry. Any one interested in causality, in particular, should read the "Abstract" and the following sections in the "Inquiry": Section II - Of the Origin of Ideas, Section III - Of the Association of Ideas, Section IV (parts I and II) - Skeptical Doubts Concerning the Operations of the Understanding, Section V (parts I and II) - Skeptical Solution of these Doubts, Section VI - Of Probability, and Section VII (parts I and II) - Of the Idea of Necessary Connection. These readings can be found in: An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, with a supplement, An Abstract of A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited with Introduction by Charles W. Hendel. Published by Prentice Hall (1995).